| OneStop | Directories | Search U of M |
![]() |
|
Home > Research > Agronomy > 2006 Minnesota Hybrid Corn Performance Trials |
||
2007 Minnesota Hybrid Corn Performance TrialsPrepared by: Tom Hoverstad, Dale Hicks, George Nelson, and Steve
Quiring
About
Results
Results of the Minnesota Corn Hybrid Evaluation Program are presented in this bulletin. The program was conducted by the University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station to provide unbiased information for use by corn growers when they choose hybrids to buy and grow. The program was financed in part by entry fees from private seed companies that chose to enter their hybrids for testing. Test Locations
Test zones, locations and maturities are as follows:
Testing ProcedureEntries: Each seed corn company could enter up to six hybrids per zone. Entries in each trial were based on the Relative Maturity (RM) provided by the company. The University of Minnesota Corn Testing Committee could also choose and enter hybrids in each test. For this reason, there may be more than six hybrids for a company in a test. Presentation of DataYields are given for individual locations along with yields and harvest moisture contents averaged across locations for 2006. Reported yields are adjusted to 15.5% grain moisture. Hybrids are ranked within maturity group by moisture content averaged across locations for 2006. Identification of TraitsGenetic modifications of hybrids will be identified using generic terms to describe the trait without identifying the specific event for genetic modification. For example CB will indentify genetic modification for corn borer resistance but will not differentiate between the Bt 11 event, the YieldGuard corn borer event or the Herculex corn borer events. Identifiers will be:
Least Significant DifferenceThe LSD (Least Significant Difference) figures at the bottom of the yield columns in the tables are statistical measures of variability in the trials. These values may be used to determine whether the difference between any two hybrids is likely to be a real difference or just natural variation. If the yield difference between two hybrids is equal to or greater than the LSD, then one can be confident that the two hybrids probably differ in yield potential. We show LSD values with a 0.2 alpha level which means that when two hybrids differ in yield by the LSD value or more, one can be 80% confident that the two hybrids differ in yield potential. The higher yielding one is the better hybrid from the yield standpoint. If the yield difference between two hybrids is less than the LSD, the two hybrids probably do not differ significantly in yield potential.
|
|||
Southern Research & Outreach Center · College
of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences |